Showing posts with label House of Hapsburgs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label House of Hapsburgs. Show all posts

Monday, August 2, 2021

JANE LAHILAHI YOUNG KA'EO : MISTRESS OF KING KAMEHAMEHA III of HAWAII and BEARER OF HIS SONS

 JANE "KINI" LAHILAHI YOUNG - KA'EO


1812/1813 - 1862
This image is supposed to be Jane and is on the
FindAGrave site, but I wonder because she was
only 48 when she died and this person seems to me to be much older.
However I can't seem to find an image of her young.


Summer always brings to mind beach vacations, surfing, and the state of Hawaii which is perhaps the most famous American state for surfing since the sport originates there among the indigenous people and so many important surfing contests take place there. The Hawaiian people, of ancient Polynesian descent, had their own Royalty, though Hawaii being ruled by Kings and Queens was over in 1893, long before the islands were granted statehood in 1959. They had a system of High Chiefs and Chiefesses that controlled land and the common people living on it. Today there are still people in Hawaii who want these islands to go back to being a separate nation because they think that businessmen overthrew their native government illegally.


Traditionally, marrying or mating with your relatives was not allowed among common Hawaiian people, but accepted practice among royals. This attitude seems to have been the case among some other geographically distant ethnic royal groups in this world too, such as the Egyptians who even practiced sibling marriage. Long ago it was thought that royal people have a special blood line which it's important to preserve and goes along with the thinking called "The Divine Right of Kings To Rule." Very basically, this means that the person believes God himself gave them the Kingship. (It must be strange to realize what an exceptional place in life you have.) Today the study of genetics and DNA seems to show us that marrying relatives, especially close relatives, such as siblings or first cousins, often reinforces genetic and even psychological qualities that are not desirable. The European family The House of Hapsburgs, certainly played that out. 

There is another factor that I think we need to consider here at Mistress Manifesto BlogSpot and that is that people who are arranged to be married, especially to close relatives, seem to not often find their legitimate spouses especially desirable. When the couple also need to produce offspring to guarantee a succession, there can be the burden of duty in trying to do so, made more awful when the offspring are born disabled or weak or die. The King or Queen who takes a lover and companion may do so out of desire, loneliness, or love - or all three. Perhaps desperation is another factor. The plight of the Royal Mistress is often that she cannot be married and her offspring face uncertainty. However, the situation for Jane Lahilahi in Hawaii may also have been one of a unique cultural understanding and cooperation among several people in her story.

Our Mistress of this summer month, Jane Lahilahi Young Ka'eo, usually just called Jane Lahilahi, (the Ka'eo the surname of her husband Joshua Ka'oe) is, like that of many a Royal Mistress, part of the history of her country. Jane was born on the Big Island, Hawaii, in a community called  Kawaihae. She came from the elite status. Her mother was a High Chiefess named Ka'oana'ehu-u and a niece of King Kamehameha I. She was also associated with this King because of an important connection via her father, John Young, a Scottish man from England who had first arrived on an American fur trading ship. John Young Olohana (his honorary Hawaiian name) was the trusted advisor to King Kamehameha I. Jane, also affectionately called Jenny or Kini , was herself a High Chiefess.* 

Jane's husband, Joshua, was a Judge on the Supreme Court of Hawaii and the grandson of King Kalani'opa'a.  Therefore their two sons (we assume he was the father) also had Royal Hawaiian blood. Her son Peter, and to whom fatherhood is attributed to Joshua, was born in 1836, and for some reason was adopted to be raised by her brother John. Another son attributed to Joshua was adopted by her brother James, but died in 1851. One wonders why she wasn't raising them herself. The answer may simply be that there was a tradition of adoption in Hawaiian culture.

These people were living during a time when missionaries were coming in - Catholic, Protestant denominations, Mormons, and converting people to Christianity which was a shift in culture that became united with a shift in politics to Western forms of government.

As a Mistress to King Kamehameha IIIJane had twin sons. One of them, Albert  lived into adulthood. This was The King's only son as the two children he had with his wife died in infancy. However, guess who this son was raised by? The King's wife, Queen Kalama.  He was the last in the direct line of the House of Kamehameha. One wonders how Jane felt about not raising any of the children she birthed. Did she see having children as a joy or a duty? Was she simply too busy to also mother? 

Jane's son Peter with her husband could have been eligible for the throne of Hawaii but  he ended up living in a leper's colony for several years and died in 1880! Until vaccinations, illness had no respect for the elite in any country.

Jane remained married and signed an X next to her name on the legal paperwork used to settle her husband's estate. Her surviving son, though with royal blood, was not allowed to be the heir to his father's throne because of his illegitimacy.  His mother wrote poetry.  He wrote poetry.  He reportedly was a "womanizer" but was there such a thing with the liberal mentality about sexuality that existed in traditional Hawaiian culture?

Jane Lahilahi was only forty-nine when she died and had suffered paralysis from a stroke eight years earlier!  Reportedly she didn't let her disability get her down. This is an indication that she had a pleasant personality and open view of life. Little seems to be known about the relationship she had with the King but certainly his wife knew about it. Jane was buried at the Royal Mausoleum in the Wyllie Crypt, which is located in Mauna ;Ala (Fragrant Hills) in Honolulu. It is considered a sacred site.



A portrait of Kamehameha III
who was born in 1813
 and was King from 1825 to 1854, when he died.
Jane's husband Joshua died in 1858 
and she is called his "widow."

Jane's son Albert Kukailimoku Kunuiakea
image from Wikimedia and FindAGrave
1853-1903



C 2021 Mistress Manifesto BlogSpot


Research for this month's posts includes WikiVisually, multiple genealogy sites, the YouTube Video called The Royal Mausoleum Na Moolelo Lecture Series, Find a Grave, the book called The Real History of Hawaii by Brien Foerster, Documentaries on Hawaii that appear on streaming services, CrownOfHawaii.com, and several others, some of which we will link to.

Saturday, March 20, 2021

THE CROWN PRINCE : MISTRESS MANIFESTO FILM REVIEW



In a retelling of the the vivid story of Mary Vetsera and Crown Prince Rudolf, this film attempts to take us back in time to a period when stability in Europe was in question and Crown Prince Rudolf was a reluctant heir, frankly not suited for the role. The Prince seemed desperate for a life of irresponsibility.

A bad relationship with his father and his parents own unhappy arranged marriage as no good example, and with few Royal women of interest, the Prince pursued the party. He went to houses of prostitution and got VD which wasn't curable. He used morphine, though a doctor supplied it. The family were devout Catholics so he upset them and the bishops by hanging out with the Masons and mixing with commoners. He had a secret romance with a Jewish woman, who didn't know he was a Prince. But, like the Buddha, he also discovered the suffering, the poverty, the orphans in the streets, the fact that there were Greek Catholics and people of other religions in the Empire he was born to rule. He was no longer protected from the realities of the Empire. 

He's a progressive, interested in the new technology of electricity. He had new ideas that were not welcome. When he wasn't in Vienna, he's in Prague. Oddly, using a Jewish pen name, he writes articles that are published in a Jewish newspaper. 

After rejecting five possible matches, he could resist no longer and married Stephanie of Belgium who hadn't even had her period. Stephanie soon grew into a woman who had political opinions and was into her role as an upcoming emperor's wife. He thought of her as just one more society girl. The couple were miserable, especially when he gave her VD that resulted in infertility and there was no longer a reason for their marriage. 

His mother lived a life separate from his father, who had a mistress. She even lived in Godollo, a town in Hungary - part of the Austrian Empire but far away. So the Prince accepted an assignment in the military, as it was hoped this responsibility would give him self discipline and confidence. His father told him to fix his marriage. He wanted an annulment. The couple followed his parent's example and he lived a bachelor's life separate life from his wife.

Despite all this, there were women competing for the Prince and mothers pushing their daughters to become his mistress. The question was and is, did Mary Vetsera really want to be with him or has her life story been rewritten to explain how or why a beautiful young women, who could have had a had good marriage among the nobility, ended up in a suicide pact.

Her love for the Crown Prince may have been played up, so that she appears to have been desperately in love, possessed, enthralled and - utterly hopelessly fatally romantic. The story might have also been invented, I speculate, to get a pushy mother out of trouble or save her reputation. (For, from other sources, I know it appears there was a cover up that her family cooperated with that resulted in her reburial.) Was Mary a murder victim? Was the Prince not just a rebel but mentally ill.

The story goes that Mary, even as a girl, had a crush on him, and her mother ripped up the pictures of him that Mary kept of her idol, when he married to discourage her.

Perhaps there was another woman, a relative, who served as an intermediary between Mary and Rudolf? For in this version of what happened at Meyering, called a hunting lodge but one of his residences and the scene of wild parties, the Prince, who was now shooting up morphine and a very ill addict, not to mention possibly becoming deranged from the complications of VD, only planned to kill himself, but young Mary went to him, desiring to be with her Prince for eternity, the only way they could be together.

Mitzi, the common and more pragmatic Mistress is shown as the only person to be concerned about him to reach out for help. She was rebuffed.

The production appears to have come out of Austria or Germany and is rich with details. Perhaps it's my research that has lead me to more speculation.

C 2021 Mistress Manifesto BlogSpot

Saturday, March 6, 2021

MARY VETSERA and THE MEET UP WITH CROWN PRINCE RUDOLF - AN AMBITIOUS MOTHER - A WORRIED BROTHER


This is a reprint.  The book was published in 1914 in Austria.  The so called Meyerling "Incident" happened in 1881, when Mary Vetsera was just seventeen years old.  Gribble's book focuses on the situation with Mary and Mizzi in Chapter XX. I like that the book was published way back, closer to that time in history.

My notes from The Life Of The Emperor Francis Joseph

The author if this book, Frances Henry Gribble, hints that MARY VETSERA had turned down a marriage prospect to Miquel of Braganza.  Her personality and character? "Infatuated and determined to have Rudolf."  Supposedly she stuck herself to him, groupie-like, and he said she was a "leech" who couldn't be shaken off.  What evidence of this is there? She wrote him a letter asking him to meet her.  She asked her mother to be sent to him.  She may have already lost her virginity.  It sounds forward for a 19th century woman but we have learned that there were many independently minded women even in times where women were denied so much.

It was suggested that Mary had been motivated by some form of political intrigue such as a conspiracy with Rudolf against his father; that Hungary might separate from the Austrian empire and that he, Rudolf, become King of Hungary.  That or perhaps some other plot. It says Mary, with her mother's approval, went off to Meyerling to be with the Crown Prince for a couple days. This suggests that her mother was encouraging her daughter towards this relationship.  Maybe she could become Queen?  The initial meeting of the doomed lovers was arranged by Countess Marie Larisch who continued to be a go-between.  Mary Vetsera did have a protective brother, Alexander Baltazzi, who went out looking for her.  This suggests to me that he loved her more or was more concerned about family reputation, knowing Crown Prince Rudolf was a despoiler.

Meyerling was not a rugged isolated dwelling in hunt county.  I t was not far from the capital, Vienna, and was a place where the Crown Prince and his friends had fun.  They drank and had affairs.  Crown Prince Rudolf's wife, Stephanie of Belgium, knew and may have followed him or had him followed.  Perhaps Crown Prince Rudolf wanted a divorce? Her father, King Leopold II had also had affairs and a mistress or two. Stephanie wasn't going to get any sympathy there.

... to be continued

C 2021 Mistress Manifesto BlogSpot